The receipts

Every number, on the record.

Every number Peddra says about itself lives here first. What is claimed, what was measured, and the line that cannot be crossed when it is said.

Said here first
Not on this page, not said.

A number that is not on this page does not get said, however true it feels.

Nothing borrowed
Measured on the founders' own corpus.

Peddra is built by three people; the corpus is the founders' own.

Checked first
Verified before published.

Every claim is checked against the measurement before it appears in public.

Dollar figures on this page are list-rate value consumed, not cash paid; for subscription use the public units are tokens, turns, and percent.

C-01Corpus scalePublishable
Say

“I metered 21 billion tokens of my own Claude Code use.”

Measured

2026-08-24 run: cache read 21,688,523,492 tokens; total across all four token classes higher. 77 sessions, 82 distinct ids, 72,337 turns, 13 projects.

Source

swift run -c release meter, 2026-08-24; an internal review of record banks 21 billion as the case-study scale word, never an account count.

Never claim

That any of this is customer data, or anyone's outside the company. The case study speaks as “I” so the privacy line and this number never contradict: one account, measured by its owner.

C-02The re-read sharePublishable
Say

97 of every 100 were Claude re-reading what it had already read.” At the wall: 98 of every 100.

Measured

Wall window 720,380,476 deduped, 98.0 percent re-reads, verified to the cent 2026-08-24 before the 0.1.5 cut.

Source

The launch-day record of 2026-08-24.

C-03The avoidable sharePublishable, as “about a third”
Say

“About a third” or “nearly a third” of the spend didn't have to happen. The bare “a third” is retired while the measured share sits under 33.3 percent.

Measured

2026-08-24: $6,418.35 (list-rate value consumed, not cash paid) avoidable of $20,256.83 list-rate value consumed. that is 31.68 percent.

The problem

A third is 33.3 percent. The corpus measures 31.68. The 33 percent figure was banked when the corpus was smaller; it has grown under launch-week load and the share has fallen. The published claim now sits marginally above the measured value, which inverts the sandbag law.

Ruled, 2026-08-25

Founder's words: “Nearly a third is good.” Later the same day: “Can we say about 1/3?” Ruled allowed. Tripwire: if a measured run drops below 30 percent, “about” dies and the claim is re-ruled. Re-hardening to a bare “a third” needs a run above 33.3 percent and a fresh ruling.

C-04The stretchPublishable, floor only
Say

Nothing yet without a ruling.

Status

PUBLISHABLE as the floor only: the published floor phrase is “a third more Claude.”

Measured

At 31.68 percent avoidable, 1 / (1 − share) gives 1.464x. The site copy prints “a third more Claude” as a deliberate floor, with the arithmetic note of record recording the ceiling. The founder ruled the floor stands (2026-08-24): recovery is never total, so the floor is the number that holds.

Never claim

The ceiling (1.464x). It is a spec-internal note, never a public claim.

C-05The largest waste linePublishable
Say

“Context growth past 100k was my biggest avoidable line by a lot, more than duplicate reads and oversized tool dumps put together.”

Measured

2026-08-24: context growth past 100k $2,795.42 (list-rate value consumed, not cash paid); duplicate file reads $116.58; oversized tool dumps $8.85; cache expiry $1,321.55.

Status

The ledger notes only that the comparison holds by a factor of about 22 against the two named lines combined; no further claim is checked.

C-06The carried cost of a tool dumpPublishable, at 200x
Say

“Carrying them was more than 200x the one-time cost.”

Measured

2026-08-24: oversized tool dumps entry cost $8.85 (list-rate value consumed, not cash paid); carried dumps as cache reads $1,980.85. Ratio 223.8x, floored to 200x for publication.

Never claim

224x. The floor is the claim.

C-07Duplicate reads, the vivid casePublishable
Say

“One project had the same file read 241 times.”

Measured

2026-08-24: dashboard.py, 241 reads, $5.30 (list-rate value consumed, not cash paid).

Never claim

The project name, unless naming it serves the point. Name the count, not the project.

C-08Grounding
Status

Withdrawn. This entry used to carry a measured claim about agent citations that traced back to nothing. Our own re-measurement could not stand behind the numbers as stated, so the claim came down before anything replaced it. It returns when a number survives its own audit.

C-09The model spend split
Status

Held back. The ledger's own rule for this number is “Available on request, not yet shaped into a claim.” Ask us and we show it.

C-10The second foreman passPublishable
Say

“Around 114 adversarial cases, the rebuild agreed on 104, and of the ten divergences three were defects in the spec itself.”

Measured

The second foreman pass, commit 66d53ae (2026-08-25): independent reimplementation reproduced the gate across about 114 adversarial cases, agreed on 104; the ten divergences included three defects that were the spec author's.

Source

Repo commit record, 66d53ae. Founder ruling 2026-08-25 on publishing repo-record numbers in social threads: “i'm not worried about publishing numbers in reddit, I know nothing we are looking at or using is outlandish.”

Never claim

That the three spec defects were caught by a reader. The point of the number is that only the rebuild found them.

C-11The resume ratioPublishable
Say

“Coming back used to cost 760K tokens. With Peddra, about 1K.”

Measured

One chat, resumed once, measured across the ten most expensive idle chats; the cold resume against the Peddra restart prompt. Banked into the site's v2.x master text before this ledger existed; carried forward 2026-08-25 as the homepage's sanctioned teach figure.

Source

Site master text of record; the measurement predates this ledger and its worksheet should be re-located and linked here on the next measurement pass.

Never claim

That every resume costs 760K; the figure is the measured cold-resume case across the ten most expensive idle chats, stated as “used to cost” for that case.

C-12The marriage proof: measured, not estimated
Say

A 1,130,000-word chat, read end to end by Apple Intelligence. Chopped into 892 pieces. Tokens spent: 0.

Source

Site master text of record; the measurement predates this ledger and its worksheet should be re-located and linked here on the next measurement pass.

Never claim

A per-chat guarantee. It is one measured chat.

C-13The company factsPublishable
Say

“Three people build Peddra.” Product of Maltby Ventures LLC, made in New York.

Measured

Founder-attested 2026-08-25: “The truth is we are 3 people.”

Source

The founder's words in session, banked same day.

Never claim

An org larger than three; never imply solo either.

Where the numbers come from

Every number is a floor. When a measurement says 223.8x, the page says 200x. When the share measures 31.68 percent, the claim is “about a third,” with a tripwire that kills it if a run drops below 30. You discover more than we promised, never less.

Every token is counted once. The ledger splits what was spent into needed and avoidable: every token lands in exactly one pile, never both, never twice. A saving that can't be traced cleanly isn't shown.

Free means measured free. The app only calls a finish free when your Mac verifiably did every bit of the work. A cost it can't measure is never shown as zero.

The record never gates. The statement, the full account of a finished chat, stays readable whether or not you ever pay.

And you hold the instrument. The meter is free forever and reads the same disk these numbers came from. Run it over your own transcripts and compare what it finds to every claim on this page before a cent changes hands. If your numbers disagree with ours, believe yours, and tell us.

The rules this page follows

The unit law. Dollar figures in this ledger are list-rate value consumed, not cash paid. For subscription readers they are never the public unit: share, tokens, turns, and stretch are. Dollars appear in public only where real money changed hands, and are always labeled counterfactual otherwise.

The borrowing law. Every entry above is from measuring the founders' own Claude Code corpus. Nothing in this file came from another person's post, thread, or article. If a third party's number ever earns a place here, it gets its own entry with the source named in the claim itself, and it never gets spoken in first person.